top of page

Uncategorized

Blogs

Breakthrough in CRISPR Gene Silencing: EXPosition Tool Predicts Expression & Knockout Success

Updated: Dec 29, 2024

A tool for CRISPR-Cas9 sgRNA evaluation based on computational models of gene expression

Background

CRISPR is widely used to silence genes by inducing mutations expected to nullify their expression. While numerous computational tools have been developed to design single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) with high cutting efficiency and minimal off-target effects, only a few tools focus specifically on predicting gene knockouts following CRISPR. These tools consider factors like conservation, amino acid composition, and frameshift likelihood. However, they neglect the impact of CRISPR on gene expression, which can dramatically affect the success of CRISPR-induced gene silencing attempts. Furthermore, information regarding gene expression can be useful even when the objective is not to silence a gene. Therefore, a tool that considers gene expression when predicting CRISPR outcomes is lacking.


Results

We developed EXPosition, the first computational tool that combines models predicting gene knockouts after CRISPR with models that forecast gene expression, offering more accurate predictions of gene knockout outcomes. EXPosition leverages deep-learning models to predict key steps in gene expression: transcription, splicing, and translation initiation. We showed our tool performs better at predicting gene knockout than existing tools across 6 datasets, 4 cell types and ~207k sgRNAs. We also validated our gene expression models using the ClinVar dataset by showing enrichment of pathogenic mutations in high-scoring mutations according to our models.


The cells in the top row are infected with a lentivirus and produce Cas9 proteins and sgRNAs; the left/right cell produces sgRNA1/2, which affects site 1/2 in a given gene, respectively. After 3 weeks (bottom left), sgRNA1 induces mutations in the gene, which affect its function and cause the cell’s fitness to decrease; this results in lower amounts of sgRNA1 being produced. Meanwhile, sgRNA2 induces mutations in the gene as well, but its function—and the cell’s fitness—is minimally affected; thus, sgRNA2 levels stay nearly the same.

4 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page